The much anticipated report of the forensic audit of the Nigerian
National Petroleum Corporation, NNPC, operations on the missing $20
billion oil money may not amount to much after all, with
PricewaterhouseCoopers, the audit firm that conducted the probe, saying
it cannot vouch for the integrity of its findings.
In a startling
introductory letter addressed to Nigeria’s Auditor General, the audit
firm said findings in its 199-page report were limited to available
information and did not constitute a review in accordance with generally
accepted standards.
“The procedures we performed did not
constitute an examination or a review in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards or attestation standards,” the firm said.
“Accordingly,
we provide no opinion, attestation or other form of assurance with
respect to our work or the information upon which our work was based,”
it added.
The report and all accompanying deliverables, the
company pointed out, were “solely for the Office of the Auditor-General
for the Federation, for their internal use and benefit and not intended
to, nor may they be relied upon, by any other third party.
The
firm concluded that the NNPC should refund to the government a minimum
of $1.48 billion of missing oil funds, a figure many Nigerians believe
is smaller than the likely actual figure.
The report however gave
no strong and independent opinion of its findings despite saying the
investigation was carried out using forensic techniques.
The firm
instead listed a series of potential factors that could render its
findings implausible, saying it had no access to the full account of
some relevant agencies like NPDC, the upstream petroleum industry
subsidiary of the NNPC.
The firm said where it lacked data, it
turned to details of earlier investigations carried out by the Nigerian
Senate, which all but cleared the NNPC, and the petroleum ministry of
any wrongdoing.
“We did not obtain any information directly from
NPDC, but in accordance with NPDC former Managing Director’s (Mr Briggs
Victor) submission to the Senate Committee hearing on the subject
matter, for the period, NPDC generated $5.11billion (net of royalties
and petroleum profits tax paid),” the firm said.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
also said without an independent legal opinion, it relied on the legal
advice of the Nigerian government’s Attorney General (AG) on the subject
of the transfers of various NNPC (55%) portion of Oil leases (OMLs)
involved in the Shell (SPDC) Divestments which impact crude oil flows in
the period.
“The AG’s opinion indicated that these transfers
were within the authority of the Minister to make. Thus, these assets
were validly transferred to NPDC. The same AG’s Legal Opinion also
indicated that NPDC was to make payments for Net Revenue (dividend) to
NNPC, which should ultimately be remitted to the Federation Account,”
PwC said.
Still, the PwC said that although it reviewed documents
submitted by the key parties involved, its work was conducted
independently, with its findings based on the review of documentation,
analytical reviews of data, and interviews conducted.
The firm
said with the exception of the Deputy Group Managing Director/ Group
Executive Director Finance and Accounts of NNPC, the Auditor-General for
the Federation, and the Minister of Petroleum Resources, it did not
discuss the findings of the report with anyone.
It is not clear
for how much the Nigerian government hired the audit firm that has now
delivered a report which it said should not be relied upon by Nigerians
and the global community.
No comments:
Post a Comment